ikhet_sekhmet: (ankh-mi-re)
Will Roscoe's article "Priests of the Goddess" compares the Graeco-Roman gallus, the Mesopotamian gala (and similar cultic performers), and the Indian and Pakistani hijra.

They have several things in common:

  • they are priests of a goddess (or goddesses)
  • they're organised into groups, and employed by temples
  • they dance, sing, and play instruments
  • they are reputed to be homosexual and/or sex workers
  • they have an alternative "third" gender
  • and they have magical powers.

    It's those two last features I'm particularly interested in.

    The galli, singular gallus, "were originally temple personnel in the cities of central Anatolia", worshippers of the goddess Cybele, whose cult eventually spread throughout the Graeco-Roman world. The hijra are devotees of the goddess Bahuchara Mata; like the galli, they tell fortunes and can "utter fearful curses". (Lifting their sari to show their scars "doom[s] the viewer to calamity".) Their tradition may date back as far as "the early first millennium". The galli were called the "third sex" and the "middle kind"; the hijra are called "third gender", "not-male", and "woman-man" (Cf UR.SAL, "man-woman", ie assinnu.)

    As Roscoe points out, while the gala et al were said to be "gender transformed" by Inanna/Ishtar, we don't know whether this was a physical transformation. Interestingly, though many hijra are ritually castrated, many postpone this and some never go through with it; it's not an absolute requirement of the job. Roscoe points out that the same may have been true for the galli.

    This may have reflected an understanding of sex and/or gender which isn't reduced to the genitals, but has to do with cultural traits such as dress, behaviour, and profession. The galli wore "partly female and partly galli-specific dress", the hijra formerly mixed male and female clothing but now wear women's clothes; the gala sang in emesal, the woman's dialect, the kurgarru and assinnu "portrayed the goddess in ritual, by wearing masks and cross-dressing", the saĝ-ur-saĝ mixed male and female dress. Roscoe suggests that "since homosexual practices were, for the receptive partner, considered androgynizing, the sexual activity of galli served to overdetermine their status as androgynes". (p 205)

    "Why is gender transgression so often attributed with religious meaning?" ponders Roscoe. Nanda writes that the hijras "call into question the basic social categories of gender on which Indian society is built. This makes the hijras objects of fear, abuse, ridicule, and sometimes pity. But hijras are also... conceptualized as special, sacred beings... both Indian society and Hindu mythology provide some positive, or at least accommodating, roles for such sexually ambiguous figures."

    ETA: By contrast, Piotr Michalowski's article on the Ur III period gala doesn't mention gender at all. (He does state that "Ur III ceremonial life" was based on concepts and symbols "very different from any that became before and after".) He remarks that "galas were important players in economic and religious life", involved in funerals, funerary cults, and organising official music performances, and possibly other entertainment. It's possible that men could temporarily take the role of a gala, such as at a wedding.

    ETA: More on the galli from The Gods of Ancient Rome by Robert Turcan, who states that Cybele's cult was overseen by "foreign priests (a Phrygian man and woman, as well as by galli... castrated like Attis, the companion who was both lover and son to the goddess."

    The galli left the goddess' sanctuary only on procession days. One procession is described as being accompanied by cymbals, tambourines, trumpets, and flutes, and the frenzied brandishing of weapons; the frightened onlookers showered the galli, who were dressed in multi-coloured garments, with offerings of coins and roses.

    During another procession, mourning the death of Attis, the galli whipped and cut themselves, and amongst all the shrieking, music, and dance, the new would-be galli castrated themselves with a flint. (One ancient writer cheekily referred to this as "the very day when the faithful of the Mother of the gods began to groan and feel sorry for themselves.").

    Legally, Romans could not be galli, as they could not be castrated, so the ritual of the taurobolium was substituted for officials such as the archgallus: he was completely soaked in the blood of a sacrificed bull (followed by a sacred marriage with the goddess "behind the curtain" - I hope he washed first).

    Turcan also mentions the "armed dance" and self-mutilation of the prophetic priestess of another Anatolian goddess, Ma-Bellona; and the "mendicant eunuchs of Atargatis" who similarly "slashed their arms with hatchets or swords" before prophesying.

    ETA: The tablet BM 29616 relates how Enki "upon hearing that Inanna was vexing heaven and earth with her wrath, fashioned the gala, and provided him with an assortment of chants as well as accompanying drum-like musical instruments... in order to soothe the goddess and help calm her rage." (Samuel Noah Kramer's article also notes that the "iršemma is a composition, often melancholy in nature", written in Emesal, "that was chanted by a temple singer known as the gala to the accompaniment of drum-like musical instruments.")

    ETA: More on the hijra from Serena Nanda. The basic definition of a hijra is an impotent man who renounces male sexuality through emasculation. However, there are exceptions to this, such as hijras who were raised as girls, but did not develop breasts or begin to menstruate at puberty, and a girl with intersex genitals who became a hijra. Nanda spoke to a hijra sex worker who was "skeptical" about the idea that hijras lacked sexual desire, and to a hijra in a relationship with a man; another was angered that men who had been married and had children had "joined [the hijra] community only for the sake of earning a living". Nanda says that the "hijra role" encompasses "people whom we in the West would differentiate as eunuchs, homosexuals, transsexuals, and transvestites."

    Nanda states that "wearing female attire is an essential and defining characteristic of the hijra. It is absolutely required for their performances, when asking for alms, and when they visit the temple of their goddess Bahuchara... Long hair is a must for a hijra." They also adopt (and exaggerate) female mannerisms, take female names and address each other with female kinship terms such as "sister" and "aunty". However, they also behave in ways which would be "outrageous" for women - lifting their skirts, smoking, using "coarse and abusive speech and gestures" (Cf the "bawdy speech" of the kurgarru).

    Nanda states that "Whereas Westerners feel uncomfortable with the ambiguities and contradictions inherent in such in-between categories as transvestitism, homosexuality, hermaphroditism, and transgenderism, and make strenuous attempts to resolve them, Hinduism not only accommodates such ambiguities, but also views them as meaningful and even powerful." She points to the plentiful "androgynes, impersonators of the opposite sex, and individuals who undergo sex changes" in Hindu myths, which are familiar through popular culture.

    __
    Kramer, Samuel Noah. Sumerian Literature and the British Museum: the Promise of the Future. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124(4) August 1980.
    Michalowski, Piotr. Love or Death? Observations on the Role of the Gala in Ur III Ceremonial Life. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 58 2006, pp 49-61.
    Nanda, Serena. "Hijras as Neither Man nor Woman". in Timothy F. Murphy (ed). Reader's guide to lesbian and gay studies. Chicago, London, Fitzroy Dearborn, 2000.
    Roscoe, Will. Priests of the Goddess: Gender Transgression in Ancient Religion. History of Religions 35(3), February 1996, pp 195-230. (The author has shared a huge chunk of the article online!)
    Turcan, Robert. The Gods of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.

  • ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Did some heavy-duty reading yesterday. We pass the gleanings on to you!

    In her chapter "Athena and the Amazons", Susan Deacy explores the paradoxical nature of Athena: patroness of patriarchy, the goddess of Greek civilisation; and yet at the same time armed and armoured, not just unmarried but refusing marriage, and closely associated with those back-to-front barbarians, those "enemies of Greek civilisation", the Amazons. Though the Amazons are long defeated, and Athena is firmly on the side of Athens and its men, these contradictions produce a restless tension, which I think speaks to the basic problem of oppressing people: keeping them oppressed.

    According to Diodorus Sicilius, Athena leads the Amazon army; like them, she clings "tenaciously to manliness (andreia) and virginity (parthenia)." She remarks that Jean-Pierre Vernant (in Myth and Society in Ancient Greece) "has demonstrated that prior to marriage, the parthenos might be deemed not to be properly and exclusively feminine, capable of assuming warrior attributes and characteristics". Goddess and Amazons both "exhibit female behaviour not regulated by marriage" - they're not under men's control. In Amazon society, Diodorus tells us, men are strictly confined to the home because otherwise they might try to take over. Oh what a giveaway!

    Anywho, there are obvious parallels here with Inanna/Ishtar, who although a wife, performs no domestic duties and bears no children, and prefers to spend her time fighting and generally making trouble. As the embodiment of what women aren't supposed to be, she reinforces what they are supposed to be... mostly. Again there's this tension, this instability: people don't fall tidily into the roles society dictates for them, especially if those roles are lesser ones. They have to be constantly put back in their place.

    (Also intriguing: Diorodus says the Gorgons were an entire race of warrior women!)

    ETA: If this discussion is accurate, the Amazons are still being killed off today, at least in the world of comics...

    __
    Deacey, Susan. "Athena and the Amazons: mortal and immortal femininity in Greek myth". in Lloyd, Alan B. (ed) What is a God?: studies in the nature of Greek divinity. London, Duckworth; Swansea, Classical Press of Wales, 1997.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Butterfly hair)
    In her chapter for the Feminist Companion to the Bible, Lana Troy contrasts the Egyptian creation stories with the Biblical version of events. In the latter, gender only becomes "relevant" when human beings appear. In Egypt, however, says Troy, "the origin of all life, the source of both creators and creation, was not asexual, or presexual, but androgynous..." (p 239). (ETA: Englund remarks that the "absolutely homogenous" origin must contain "a potential heterogenity" to produce plurality; for the Egyptians, that heterogenity was the duality of gender, which was "only latent, only exist[ing] as a predisposition". (pp 20-21). I can't help thinking of the Big Bang - the tiny random flaws which gave rise to the large-scale structures of our universe, the asymmetry between matter and anti-matter, and most of all, the four forces which split apart from each other in those first fractions of a second.)

    For example: Nun, the Father of the Gods, is a vast watery container, a sort of uterus; Nut, possibly his female counterpart, is the equivalent heavenly body of water through which the sun barque travels to be reborn each morning. The male creator deity Atum masturbates, swallows his semen, and spits out his children Shu and Tefnut; his hand becomes hypostastized as a goddess in her own right, and his mouth plays the role of a womb. Atum's Eye is also a female hypostasis, his "active element", which can retrieve Shu and Tefnut and return them to him. te Velde remarks that this female aspect of Atum or re is "carried over to Tefnut", Eye of Re (p 249); he connects the Eye's retrieval of the twins to the story of the Distant goddess, in which Shu or another god must in turn retrieve the sulking Eye of Re. Troy points out that the eye is womblike, a container of water whose tears produce the human race (p 263). Even in the Theban creation, where the waters of Nun are the god's semen, his semen becomes personified as a goddess!

    OTOH, in the creation story from Esna, the creatrix Mehetweret appears to be solely female. Troy suggests this was conceivable to the Egyptians where male-only reproduction was harder to imagine. ETA: But Cooney - see below - quotes from an Esna hymn which describes Neith, aka Mehetweret, as "two-thirds male and one-third female". Also at Esna, Khnum not only "moulds" people, but also both begets and gives birth to them. (ETA: Englund: "All the gods of the Heliopolitan Ennead are hypostases of the androgynous Atum" (p 11).)

    To come back to Troy, while male and female are both needed for the creation, they're not equal partners. She remarks, "Just as male fertility is incidental in the Esna version of creation, at Thebes the feminine reproductive mode is largely subsumed as an attribute of the male creator." (p 258) But the female aspect of the creator can also act independently, for example, in the conflict between father and daughter when the Eye returns to discover she's been replaced (resolved by the creator placing her on his forehead as the uraeus). (p 265)

    One point which Troy makes which struck me as odd, however, was her suggestion that Seth and Nephthys "appear to reflect male and female characteristics in their most absolute form... The name Nephthys, in Egyptian Nbt-Hwt, 'Mistress of the House', suggests a personification of the womb", by parallel with Hathor's name, Hwt-Hr, "House of Horus", "referring to her role as his mother". But, as Troy notes, Set and Nephthys are childless (can you imagine how it might complicate the mythology if they weren't?!). Although later she is considered to be the mother of Anubis, surely Nephthys' most important role is as a sister, not a mother. te Velde points out that she is even "sometimes said to lack a vulva". (Pinch: "Perhaps because of her sham marriage, Nephthys is described in one of the Pyramid Texts [Utterance 534] as 'an imitation woman with no vagina.'" (p 171)) te Velde remarks that she "plays those parts in mythology that women without a husband filled in the Egyptian society, ie as a wailing-woman and nursemaid." (p 253) (ETA: Pyramid Text 1154 says of the king, "Isis has conceived (šsp) him, Nephthys has begotten (wtt) him."!)

    Anywho, Troy concludes by pointing out that gender is "an indissoluble link between the divine and mortal worlds", something humans share with the gods. (By contrast, in the Bible, gender is "the culmination of the creator's labours", which is also "elevating".)

    ETA: Bit more from my box o' photocopies. Kathlyn M. Cooney describes five Late Period / Ptolemaic bronze figurines of pantheistic deities, which combine not just human and animal elements, but male and female as well. "By combining numerous divine forms into a complex composite, these creative divinity figures incorporate as many magical and divine powers (b3w) as possible into one small statuette." Other than the creator gods, androgynous deities like this are rare (the ithyphallic Mut being one example). Cooney suggests such a figure combines "male potency for creation" with "female protection, as the catalyst and vessel for healing", and perhaps manifests the primal creator god "in visible form that is accessible to worshippers". (Another example would be Atum's parents in the Late Period Memphite Theology - Ptah-Nun, and Ptah-Naunet.)

    ETA: Set's birth was "the beginning of confusion (hnnw)." :) (te Velde, p 252)

    __
    Cooney, Kathlyn M. Androgynous Bronze Figurines in Storage at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. in D'Auria, Sue H. (ed). Servant of Mut : studies in honor of Richard A. Fazzini. Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2008. pp 63-69.

    Englund, Gertie. Gods as a Frame of Reference: On Thinking and Concepts of Thought in Ancient Egypt. Boreas 20 1991, pp 7-28.

    Pinch, Geraldine. Egyptian mythology : a guide to the gods, goddesses, and traditions of ancient Egypt. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.

    te Velde, Herman. "Relations and Conflicts between Egyptian Gods, particularly in the Divine Ennead of Heliopolis", in Struggles of Gods. Papers of the Groningen Work Group for the Study of the History of Religions. Berlin, New York : Mouton, 1984. pp 239-257.

    Troy, Lana. "Engendering Creation in Ancient Egypt: Still and Flowing Waters." in Brenner, Athalya and Carole Fontaine (eds). A Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: approaches, methods and strategies (The Feminist Companion to the Bible, vol. 11). Sheffield, England, Sheffield Academic Press, 1997. pp 238-268.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (snakes alive!)
    In recent postings I've noted some of the words used in the Hebrew Bible in laws forbidding the mixing of things. In Leviticus 19.19, the word kalayim is used thrice, each time to mean "two kinds" - two kinds of animals, two kinds of seeds, two kinds of fabric. The same term occurs in Deuteronomy 22.9, again referring to two kinds of seeds, though not in Deuteronomy 22:11, which also states the rule about cloth, but uses the term shaatnez, meaning "mixed stuff". (NB - my Biblical Hebrew is non-existent - I'm relying on biblios.com for these translations.)

    Now, discussing the Mesopotamian temple singer called the kalû (the kulu'u might be the same thing), Uri Gabbay suggests that this Akkadian word comes from the same Semitic root as kalayim - for example, kl'at in Ugaritic and kilā in Arabic both mean "both". So the the kalû would be "the one who is both", ie "the one who is both sexes". (Gabbay suggests the Sumerian gala is actually a rendering of the Akkadian word, and not the other way around as would be more usual.)

    Gabbay takes this to mean the kalû was a hermaphrodite. But could it be someone who is both genders? I'll keep reading (and add any further stuff about this particular cult participant to this posting.)

    ETA: Mary Douglas: "Holiness means keeping distinct the categories of creation. It therefore involves correct definition, discrimination and order."

    __
    Douglas, Mary. "The Abominations of Leviticus". in Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.
    Gabbay, Uri. "The Akkadian Word for Third Gender: The kalû (gala) Once Again". In Biggs, R.D., J. Myers and M.T. Roth (eds). Proceedings of the 51st Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 62), Chicago 2008, pp. 49-56.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (ankh-mi-re)
    Herewith some notes on gender complexity in various cultures, relevant to the question of gender in the Ancient Near East. (I'll add additional notes to this posting as I find more references. Last update 10 February 2018 (bit from Amazons and Military Maids).)

    Wheelwright, Julie. "Introduction". In Amazons and Military Maids: women who dressed as men in pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. Pandora, London; San Francisco, 1990.

    "Anthropologist Claude E. Schaeffer collected oral accounts from what is now southern British Columbia, about the miraculous transformation of a Kutenai woman. She married a Quebecois fur trader in 1809 but returned to her family the following year claiming that her husband had performed an 'operation' on her. 'I am a man now,' she told her relatuves. 'We Indians did not believe the white people possessed such power from the supernaturals. I can tell you they do, greater power than we have. They changed my sex while I was with them.' Newly renamed as Kauxuma Nu Pika, which translates as 'gone to the spirits', she continued to live as a man until her death in 1837." (p xv)

    Johnson, Crystal. "Napanangka: the true power of being proud". In Colouring the rainbow: blak queer and trans perspectives life stories and essays by first nations people of Australia. Edited by Dino Hodge. Mile End, SA, Wakefield Press, 2015.

    "One day when I was a bit older, in my teens, I sat down with my grandmother and said to her about why she didn't mind me wearing girl's clothes. She said that there were always sistergirls [trans women] in Aboriginal culture and there always were trans people long before European settlement in Australia. And people like her tribal group - being the last tribe to be discovered in Australia - I believe her for that because she didn't come into contact with a white person until she was a teenager. In Arrente they call us 'gawarregwarre'; Luritja mob, they say like 'kungakunga,' same again, meaning like 'girl girl'; Warlpiri, they say 'karnta-pia'. The trans women at that time would join the women to do traditional women duties like cooking, collecting bush fruit, growing up the children, and making bush medicine. They'd go through women's ceremony and they'd be respected as women. They'd have relationships with men and be married because they'd be identified as straight women." (p 37)

    Hollimon, Sandra. "Warfare and Gender in the Northern Plains: Osteological Evidence of Trauma Reconsidered." in Arnold, Bettina and Nancy L. Wicker (eds). Gender and the Archaeology of Death. Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press, c2001.

    Third and fourth genders ("Two-Spirit People") in Plains Indian society have been "extensively documented", with the emphasis on biological males who adopt feminine dress and occupations. "It appears that for some North American groups, a combination of characteristics qualified a female person as belonging to a named 'fourth gender'; these include participation in male-dominated subsistence activities such as hunting, inclusion in war parties as armed combatants, occasional and/or partial cross-dressing, sexual activity with women, and refusal to marry men."

    Two-spirit men participated in war parties, and in some cultures, were considered lucky to have along. Hollimon notes that "The gender role designated 'warrior woman' can be distinguished from the occasional participation of women in war parties" - she fought often, was good at it, and it was clearly a part of her identity.In some societies, women who dreamed of "Double Woman" "were given sexual license that was unavailable to normative women" and "might obtain power to make medicines or war shields, amongst other skills."

    [Tons of references. I don't want to go too berserk, but I would like to get my hands on the books Two-Spirit People (1997) and Changing Ones (1998).]

    Crass, Barbara A. "Gender and Mortuary Analysis". in Arnold, Bettina and Nancy L. Wicker (eds). Gender and the Archaeology of Death. Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press, c2001.

    Inuit gender is amazing. For one thing, Inuit languages lack gendered pronouns. For another, the division of labour is "fluid and flexible", with men cooking and sewing and women sealing and whaling. But this is the part that blew my mind: "Personal names are considered an aspect of one of the souls (most groups believe in two) the Inuit possess... When the name of a recently deceased relative or community member is given to a newborn, the infant is believed to acquire some of the wisdom, skills, and traits of the deceased. The child becomes a living representative of the deceased person, who is often viewed as being partially reincarnated. This procedure may be repeated, resulting in the child assuming multiple gender roles..." One Inuit boy was called "stepmother" by his dad and "aunt" by his mum, "for these were their respective relationships to the woman whose soul was the boy's guardian."

    Inuit clothing is gendered - for example, a woman's parka has a hood big enough to carry a child in, slung against her back - but Crass gives various examples of cross-dressing. "Among the Caribou Inuit, a child given the name of a deceased relative of the opposite sex wore the clothing of that sex." Shamans are androgynous, "occupying a shifting position between male and female. Their clothing could combine the characteristic features of both sexes".

    But to get to the specific topic of this posting: "biological males who dressed, worked, and lived as females are described among the Inuit of Kodiak Island.. Often these transformers were shamans, but all gender transformers were influential. Some of them were males raised as females from infancy, either because of their 'feminine' appearance or a desire of the parents to have a daughter. Parents could designate a male child to become a shaman at birth and raise that child as a female."

    Crass notes that no "female-to-male gender transformers are reported" from the Island, but also that they are sometimes "invisible" to "naive ethnographers" - such as the chap who, in 1980 in Greenland, "had an opportunity to observe two female gender transformers... but could not distinguish them from the men. They were both good sealers and clever at women's work." (Hollimon makes the same point about Plains Indians.)

    (I found more examples of Inuit gender complexity in an online book review.)

    Wilfred Thesiger, The Marsh Arabs. Penguin, London, 1977.

    In the fifties, Thesiger spent long periods of time in southern Iraq, living amongst the 'Marshmen'. These guys are still around, but they had a bastard of a time under Saddam. Some fled to Australia, where of course we treated them like criminals. *grinds teeth together* Anyway:

    "'A mustarjil is born a woman,' Amara explained. 'She cannot help that; but she has the heart of a man, so she lives like a man.'

    'Do men accept her?'

    'Certainly. We eat with her and she may sit in the mudhif. When she dies, we fire off our rifles to honour her. We never do that for a woman. In Majid's village there is one who fought bravely in the war against Haji Sulaiman.'

    'Do they always wear their hair plaited?'

    'Usually they shave it off like men.'

    'Do mustarjils ever marry?'

    'No, they sleep with women as we do.'

    Once, however, we were in a village for a marriage, when the bride, to everyone's amazement, was in fact a mustarjil. In this case she had agreed to wear women's clothes and to sleep with her husband on the condition that he never asked her to do women's work. The mustarjils were much respected, and their nearest equivalent seemed to be the Amazons of antiquity.'

    (Thesiger also encounters a Marsh Arab transwoman: 'I often noticed the same man washing dishes on the river bank with the women. Accepted by them, he seemed quite at home. These people were kinder to him than we would have been in our society.')
    The thing about not having to do woman's work reminds me of the bridal Inanna's wriggling out of the womanly work of weaving. (Although her brother Utu promises to bring her the fully processed textiles, I'll bet he didn't have to pluck, comb, spin, braid, warp, weave, and dye them himself! I wonder who got stuck with the job?)

    Note to self: find out whether 'the heart of a man', in Arabic, has the same sense of 'heart' as in English, or as in Sumerian or Egyptian: does Amara the canoeboy mean 'courage', or something more like 'mind' or 'soul'?

    Stylianoudi, M.-G. Lily. "On Transvestism". in Berggreen, Brit and Nanno Marinatos (eds). Greece and Gender. Bergen, Norway, Norwegian Institute at Athens, 1995.

    "In some cultures, such as those of the Siberian Chukchee, the institutionalised role of shaman is provided for adult male homosexuals. These men adopt feminine dress, activities, mannerisms, become 'wives' of other men and assume the 'female' role in anal intercourse. Their social status may be high." (p 158)

    The Zar possession cult of Ethiopia "is mostly a feminine cult and it is taken up by women when they wish to publicly voice opinions which ordinarily, because of their role and status, they would not be allowed to... the demons are males and some of them are fierce warriors so that the possessed woman is allowed to carry weapons or any other 'male' attributes characteristic of the demon." (p 155)

    Wikan, Unni. "The Xanith: a Third Gender Role?" in Behind the veil in Arabia: Women in Oman. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

    The xaniths of the Omani city of Sohar are common and, from Wikan's account, seem pretty well-accepted (which may seem surprising - she discusses Omani attitudes to gender and sexuality, and how the xanith fits into the picture, at length). They're men who declares themselves women, though they're not permitted to wear women's clothing; instead they wear a male dishdasha modified with the waist of a female dress. "Male clothing is white; females wear patterned cloth in bright colours; xaniths wear unpatterned cloth in pastel colours." Similarly, their hair length and style are distinct, and unlike both men and women, they go bareheaded. At the time of Wikan's study (the seventies), Omani women were strictly secluded and segregated; at meals, weddings, and so forth, xaniths are found with the women, who don't follow the usual rules of modesty with them. However, a xanith is still a man for the purposes of the law, and is referred to with masculine pronouns. Wikan's informants were certain that all xaniths are sex workers whose clients were men (legal, unlike sex work by women) although some work as domestic servants. Interestingly, some xaniths chose to return to the role of men, and some even move back and forth between their male and female roles. (Wikipedia gives the word as khanith, meaning "effeminate", and notes its use as an insult. Do note the age of this study.)

    Wikan remarks: "Here, then, may be the key to an understanding of the gender system in Sohar. It is the sexual act, not the sexual organs, which is fundamentally constitutive of gender. And there is no confusion possible in this culture between the male and female role in intercourse: the man "enters", the woman "receives"; the man is active, the woman is passive. Behaviour, and not anatomy, is the basis for the Omani conceptualization of gender identity." (p 175)

     

    Law, Benjamin. Gaysia: Adventures in the Queer East. Collingwood, Vic. : Black Inc., 2012.


    "Thailand has a long history of transsexualism. Before the 1960s, it had three gender categories: chai (masculine); ying (feminine); and kathoey, a sort of umbrella term that referred to in-betweeners - effeminate men, masculine women and people with intersex conditions. Afterwards, those categories splintered further into super-specific identities like gay, tom (masculine lesbian) and dee (feminine lesbian)." (p 51)

    "Let's take a brief tour through a Beginner's Guide to Homosexual Slang in Myanmar. Repeat after me. Achauk (pronounced 'ah-chowk') is a handy, all-encompassing term for any man who has sex with other men. Use it carefully, because it's the Burmese equivalent of 'faggot'... There are three categories of achauk... Apwint ('ah-pwint', meaning 'open') are Burma's queens, who live and dress as women and are always - always - on the receiving end of anal sex." (p 207) Apwint sleep with either thange (macho, out, always on top) or (straight-acting) abone. Apwint dance at nat spirit festivals, "where apwint were revered as spirit mediums in dance ceremonies that predated Buddhism." (p 229)

    The same book mentions "Jogappas, male devotees of the Hindu goddess Yellamma, [who] dressed in the saris and jewellery of married women and sexually serviced men as a display of their religious devotion."

    Online:

    The Eerie Beauty of Rare Alphabets, The Atlantic, August 2011: "The Buginese language spoken on Indonesian islands has five genders—feminine woman, feminine man, masculine female, masculine man, and bissu ('a gender that embodies both male and female energies, and is thus revered as mystical and wise')."

    The Sacrifices of Albania's 'Sworn Virgins'

    Sworn to virginity and living as men in Albania

    Fa'afafine - Samoan boys brought up as girls

    Fa'afafine: The boys raised to be girls

    Sulawesi's fifth gender (Inside Indonesia, 2 April 2001). "The Bugis acknowledge three sexes (female, male, hermaphrodite), four genders (women, men, calabai, and calalai), and a fifth meta-gender group, the bissu." | In Indonesia, Non-Binary Gender is a Centuries-Old Idea (Atlas Obscura, 18 June 2016)

    Sistergirls and brotherboys unite to strengthen spirits (ABC, 21 November 2016). A gathering of gender-diverse Indigenous Australians.



     
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Butterfly hair)
    Have recently read a couple of extremely interesting chapters from Sex and Gender in the Ancient Near East.

    In one, Kathleen McCaffrey points out: "In our culture, gender tends to be regarded as a biological constant, but not all cultures share this belief." She points to the "third and fourth gender categories" recognised "in localities as diverse as India, Thailand, the Phillipines, Oman, Polynesia, Nigeria, the Balkans, Brazil and among Native American tribes" and modern Iran and Iraq. For these cultures, "genitals are not an essential sign of gender", but rather "social role and status" - the person's dress, occupation, and behaviour signify their gender.

    If the Mesopotamians took a similar approach, then applying "Western taxonomic classifications" to the evidence will result in confusion. McCaffrey discusses Inanna/Ishtar's ability to change men into women and vice versa; scholars have debated whether this involved a physical change, such as castration, or perhaps referred to hermaphroditism or intersexuality. But perhaps this is only the Western "common sense" assumption that sex = genital sex. (OTOH, that curse invoking Ishtar of Alalakh implies a physical change - or is that a matter of interpretation?)

    McCaffrey points to a number of examples which seem confusing to "Western gender logic", such as the statue of Ur-Nanshe, who appears female but has a masculine name and dress, and evidence from art and graves that some men at Hasanlu wore women's garments.

    In the same book, Stephanie Dalley (in "Evolution of Gender in Mesopotamian Mythology and Icongraphy with a Possible Explanation of ša rešen, 'the man with two heads'") discusses creation mythology. Very briefly summarised, the first creatures are sexless or bisexual; the division into male and female, and sexual reproduction, arises later. She suggests that, for Babylonian thinkers, this might have been the result of translating from Sumerian into Akkadian - from a language with the genders "animate" and "inanimate" into a language with the genders "male" and "female". "... for them words were deeply rooted in the actual nature of the things they described... the change in noun categories would mirror a change in the objects which these nouns represented". (Similarly, she suggests, this could explain apparent inconsistencies in divine gender, such as male deities with Nin- in their names, and Shapash/Shamash, Ishtar/Athtar, and Tiamat/Yam.)

    __
    McCaffrey, Kathleen. "Reconsidering Gender Ambiguity in Mesopotamia: Is a Beard Just a Beard?". in Parpola, S. and R. M. Whiting (eds). Sex and Gender in the Ancient Near East. Proceedings of the 47th Rencontre Assyriolgique Internationale, Helsinki, July 2-6, 2001. Compte rendu, Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale 47. Helsinki : Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 2002.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Angel of the Birds 1)
    With a title like that, how could I resist? :D
    • There's only one known mention of homosexuality in Mesopotamian law, in two of the Middle Assyrian Laws. (Scholars disagree over their exact meaning.)

    • Hittite laws forbad incest and bestiality, terming them hurkel, but homosexuality was not hurkel, and there's no known evidence it was illegal.

    • In the Hebrew Bible, bestiality is defined as tebel, which gets translated as "perversion", "unnatural" etc but literally means "confusion", from a root meaning "mix". I had a look at those laws about not mixing things from Deuteronomy, but they don't use the term - crossdressing is a toebah, "something morally disgusting", and the stuff about seeds, animals, and fabrics etc isn't defined, only prohibited. The only other place tebel appears is in Lev 20.12 where it defines incest between father and daughter.

    • There's no known mention of bestiality in Mesopotamian laws. Hittite law made it a crime to have sex with a cow, a sheep, a pig, or a dog, but not - to scholarly puzzlement - with a horse or a mule. A purification ritual essentially makes the animal the offender's wife - he has to "veil her like a bride", and pay her "dowry", perhaps as a fine. (I wonder if this was a form of public mockery, something like a charivari.)

    • Perhaps, before encountering their first women, Adam and/or Enkidu mated with animals. Blimey.

    Questions!
    • Do we have evidence of whether the death penalty was actually carried out for sexual crimes by the Hebrews? I've got a hazy memory of someone saying the harsher penalties of the Code of Hammurabi weren't always applied, which presumably would be based on court documents.

    • How about the use of keleb, Hebrew for "dog", to indicate a male sex worker? Is that a scholarly guess about Deut 23.19, or is there other evidence for it?
    __

    Hoffner, Harry A. Incest, Sodomy and Bestiality in the Ancient Near East. in Hoffner, Harry A. (ed.) Orient and Occident: Essays presented to Cyrus H. Gordon on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. Kevelaer, Butzon & Bercker; Neukirchen-Vluyn, Neukirchener Verlag, 1973.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    "Sometimes it is masculinity in the sense of battle prowess which is desired by the person who invests himself/herself in the symbols, as for example Paghat (ANET, p. 155), who in order to secure for herself masculine battle prowess to slay her brother's murderer dons masculine attire and even stains her skin with red murex, yet for purposes of disguising her intent she then puts on women's clothes over the men's clothes!"

    - Hoffner Jr, Harry A. Symbols for Masculinity and Feminity: Their Use in Ancient near Eastern Sympathetic Magic Rituals. Journal of Biblical Literature 85(3) September 1966, pp. 326-334.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Ooh what a stimulatin' book this is. I've only had time to skim-read, alas. The point to which scholar Athalya Brenner repeatedly returns is the Hebrew aversion to "admixtures". Things need to be kept tidily in their categories, especially similar things which might be confused (1).

    Brenner suggests that sexual laws in the Hebrew Bible are a version of this avoidance of crossing boundaries. For example, Deuteronomy 22.5, which forbids cross-dressing. "This short passage betrays a concern, perhaps an anxiety, about visible differences between the clothed male and female bodies; they should be clear cut." (2) She adds (citing Mary Douglas, whom I've not yet read): "The insistence on easily recognisable boundaries often signifies uncertainty about those boundaries." Could the law against male anal intercourse be explained by the idea that men do the penetrating, so a man who is penetrated has violated the gender boundary? (p 140)

    Another of Brenner's points, which shook up the contents of my skull, is that archaeologists have tended to accept what men in ancient societies have said about women, pregnancy, and children, ie, that ancient women eagerly desired lots of kids. Reviewing what we know about ancient contraception and abortion, she suggests that this might not have always been the case. Further boggling my mind, she points out that many of the aromatic substances mentioned in the Song of Songs were also the ingredients of birth control preparations, such as pomegranates, honey, and myrrh, and wonders if these mentions were meant to reassure the female character to whom the seductive language is addressed.

    Brenner also ponders whether the "prostitutes" of the Bible may have actually been women not under the economic control of men (which echoes a lot of recent scholarly writing about Mesopotamia and the harimtu - I have a mountain of material on this topic to blog about one of these days :). She points out that the Hebrew word translated as "harlot/ry" refers to any kind of illicit sex, including sex work, fornication, and adultery; and that it's not clear whether some of the women called "prostitute" actually engaged in sex work. Some were economically independent: Rahab, and the women who sought Solomon's judgement, owned their own houses. (p 149-150)

    (1) Brenner points out that Leviticus 19:19 presumably forbids the crossing of horses and donkeys, but that puzzlingly, there are plenty of mentions of mules. I wonder if the Hebrews saw the horse and the donkey as essentially the same sort of animal? Or did they just import mules? (Note to self: other admixture laws appear in Deuteronomy 22:9 and 22:11.)

    (2) Brenner points out (citing Susan Griffin, who I haven't read yet either) that clothing is what separates culture from nature - explicitly, in the case of Genesis 3.7. But naked male and female bodies don't have the same meaning in the Bible: the female body is "relatively public", while the male body and especially the penis is fastidiously protected, whether by underwear or by language - a "textual spiritualisation", suggests Brenner, turning penis into invisible phallus. (p 38) Women's genitals, by contrast, are exposed as part of a shaming punishment. (p 42)

    __
    Athalya Brenner. The Intercourse of Knowledge: on Gendering Desire and "Sexuality" in the Hebrew Bible. Brill, Leiden/New York/Köln, 1997
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Julia Asher-Greve begins her chapter "The Essential Body: Mesopotamian Conceptions of the Gendered Body" by talking about how the "Western philosophical tradition" sees "mind" as separate from, and superior to, "body", and the many, many associated concepts. I thought it'd be useful to diagram them:

    At left, BODY: women, nature, emotion, particular, anatomical, material, spatial, temporal, fallible. At right, MIND: infallible, eternal, spiritual, mental, universal, reason, culture, men.

    That was fun, I'm going to do another one in a minute!

    Anyway, Asher-Greve's argument is that Ancient Near Eastern Thought didn't have this division between "mind/body, mind/matter or spiritual/material" and the associated "denigrating view of women". For example, the Sumerian word ša, literally heart, also means the body, the internal organs, and "mind, thought, plan, desire", with the heart considered "the seat of will, thought and feeling". (She points out the parallel with the Egyptian word ib.)

    Asher-Greve notes that Sumerian lacks a specific term for "mind" or "human brain", the closest thing being the "word for intelligence, understanding and sense, geštu", written with the sign for ear, which indicates these faculties were acquired by hearing... in many cultures understanding, thinking and knowing are associated with hearing". What's more, in Mesopotamian mythology, human beings are created in one go; the Biblical creation story has the body created before the soul.

    More from the chapter later. On a side note, it includes a photo of this statue of a woman, which IMHO is exploding with personality. What a nose! :D

    (Something that keeps popping up in these things is the equation of "neuter" with "androgynous" - for example, angels in Western art, or the sex of the primordial human in myth. I think this must tie in with the idea that, in Western culture, you must have a gender, you must have one gender, and it must be clear which one. (Paraphrasing Susan Stryker in Transgender History there.) If you don't, you're supernatural at best. Even Mesopotamia seems to have that association between the divine and the breakdown of simple gender categories. Hmmm.)

    __
    Asher-Greve, Julia. "The Essential Body: Mesopotamian Conceptions of the Gendered Body". in Wyke, Maria (ed). Gender and the Body in the Ancient Mediterranean. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell, 1998.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Butterfly hair)
    I read another chapter of Sex and Gender in the Ancient Near East, and one from Gender and the Body in the Ancient Mediterranean, both by Julia M. Asher-Greve. Let's have the first one first:

    In my previous posting I was talking about the possibility that, for the Mesopotamians, gender was not defined by genitals but by dress, behaviour, occupation, behaviours, and so forth. Now in Sex and Gender (her chapter is titled "Decisive Sex, Essential Gender"), Asher-Greve remarks, "Sexual differences were not considered me... But qualities associated with sexual differences are listed as essences." (p 13) Further, marriage is not listed as a me, but kissing and intercourse are. (p 17) If that's right, it'd be a striking bit of evidence in that direction. "Because humans had sex differences and sex roles in common with deities and animals", she suggests, "sex differences were not considered" me, but "gender differences" were "because they make gender what it is". (p 21)

    Depressingly, Asher-Greve states that proper gender behaviour was enforced not just by authority figures such as teachers, parents, and by the law, but also by "ridicule, insults, (peer) pressure... Women criticized each other for non-conforming behaviour and pressured themselves to behave in accordance with their gender role." (p 15) So there's something we have in common with the ancients, anyway. (It's striking that then, as now, "normal", "natural" gender behaviour had to be rigorously culturally enforced.)

    Mesopotamian thinking about "physiological sex anomalies" was "paradoxical". In Enki and Ninmah, the goddess creates a human without sexual organs; like all the anomalous people she creates, this one is given a place in society, as the king's attendant. But at the same time, intersex children were omens of "miscarriage, death, and even calamity for the country", and may have been killed. (Asher-Greve suggests that, over time, attitudes changed, perhaps alongside the gradual reduction of women's status.)

    Asher-Greve argues that historically, androgynous beings have been seen not as half-male and half-female, but as male creatures "incorporating feminine qualities and physicality". Discussing gender ambiguous foundation figures from Mesopotamia, she suggests they should be read as feminine men: kings who, as temple-builders and thus creators, were "perfect", incorporating the female. (She compares this to the feminised representation of Akhenaten.) In this way, the founders resembled the first human, who was created to work for the gods, and represented all humankind.

    One thing I'm not clear about is how systematically archaeologists identify the gender of figures in ancient art. Is it a matter of taking figures where the gender is known (eg where there's accompanying text), working out their common characteristics, and then using those to type the unknown figures? Or is it more a matter of "Well, that looks like a woman to me"? Or a mixture of both? (I confess Asher-Greve doesn't provide enough data, especially not directly Mesopotamian evidence, to convince me of some of her extremely interesting ideas.)

    The other chapter later!

    __
    S. Parpola and R. M. Whiting (eds). Sex and Gender in the Ancient Near East. Proceedings of the 47th Rencontre Assyriolgique Internationale, Helsinki, July 2-6, 2001. Compte rendu, Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale 47. Helsinki : Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 2002.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Lemme see if I can round up what I've got so far. Lots more references to follow up, but this will do for a start.

    It looks like there are two basic versions of ithyphallic Mut:
    1. Mummiform, lioness-headed, with flail; seen at the Temple of Hibis and the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak;
       
    2. Winged, three-headed, with a man's head wearing the double crown, and a lioness head and a vulture head each wearing the double-plumed crown, described and illustrated in Chapter 164 of the Book of the Dead. ETA: Champollion included a version of this figure in his Pantheon Egyptien.
    The ithyphallic Mut at Hibis is Mwt-'3t, Mut the Great; she holds her phallus in one hand. (Davies; Cruz-Uribe, p 2, referring to Davies, Plate 2, Register III, no. 8) The version at Karnak shows only the upraised hand, above which a flail sort of floats, and wears the solar disc with a uraeus. (More snaps here.)1 ETA: There's a drawing of this scene in Lepsius' Denkmaeler aus Aegypten (p 219, figure b).

    ETA: Jorge Ogdon identifies the goddess part of the Karnak figure as Sekhmet: "It is relevant that the ithyphallic form of Min is here mixed with Sekhmet, the 'fiery eye' of Re [and] the 'terrible aspect' of Re sent by the god to destroy men, and, therefore, the Karnak relief depicts a 'terrible aspect' of sexual symbolism and of Min himself." (Ogdon believes Min's iconography is aggressive and apotropaic - both the erect phallus, and the arm raised in what he sees as a gesture of repulsion.)

    The three-headed edition, aka Sekhmet-Bastet-Raet (or Sekhmet-Bast-Ra - the final t is not written) is also called "Mother of Škks" and "royal wife of Rhk".

    The Lexikon also mentions an ithyphallic Sekhmet-'3t, standing and holding a snake in one hand, crowned by the solar disc. She appears on a healing statue (Turin 3031).

    And now, a brief excursus on the Temple Of Amun-Re at Hibis. There seem to be a lot of ithyphallic deities at Hibis - well, there are a lot of deities at Hibis, full stop! 359 in the Sanctuary alone. It's just god-o-rama in there, a catalogue of every god in Egypt. Lots of sole examples of deities, and lots of mysteries: for example, who's the crocodile-headed goddess holding a sidelock (Plat 2, Register II, no. 13)?! And Sekhmet portrayed as a mongoose. Or a hedgehog. Scholars are divided. Basically, everyone in the Late Period was dropping acid.

    (Note to self: the lion-headed mummiform ithyphallic god with flail in "Late Period Temples" is Wenep, not Mut - Cruz-Uribe p 32. The plate in Hoskins shows the same wall, but a lot of the drawings don't match. ETA: A similar deity - but who, and where?)
    _
    Cruz-Uribe, Eugene. Hibis temple project I: Translations, commentary, discussions and sign list. San Antonio, Texas, Van Siclen Books, 1988.
    Davies, N. de Garis. The Temple of Hibis in El-Khargeh Oasis III (Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 17), the Museum, New York, 1953. [NB: not to be confused with the combined edition of volumes I and II brought out in 1973. Cruz-Uribe's book refers to plates in vol. III.)
    Ogden, Jorge. Some notes on the iconography of the god Min. Bulletin of the Egyptological Seminar 7, 1985/6, pp 29-41.

    1I found a 2005 forum comment from Dr. Cruz-Uribe in which he states this is more likely to be a male deity, possibly Min, "given its position on the wall and the context". It's cheeky for an amateur like me to dispute his opinion, but the resemblance with the Mut at Hibis is striking, as is the presence of the solar disc and uraeus, and perhaps also the figure of Khonsu standing behind her.

    ETA: Another participant in the forum discussion remarks that the figure "is located in room 12 of the temple of Khonsu, west wall (PM II, p. 242, no. 109)." That matches Porter and Moss' Topographical BiblIography, vol 2, p 242: "Room XII. L.D.Text,iii, pp. 69 [bottom] - 70 [top]." "(109) [1st ed. 82; Loc. KM. 620] Ramesses IV censing and libating to lion-headed and bull-headed gods. L.D. iii 219 [b]; PRISSE, Mon. pl. xxxvi [I]; CHIC. OR. INST. photos. 3247,3439." The refs are to (Loc:) Nelson, H. Key plans showing locations of Theban temple decorations. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications, 56, 1941 (Closed Access DS42.4 .C45 vol 56, also Fisher F 932 9); Lepsius Denkmaeler (219 [b] linked above); and Prisse, A. Monuments égyptiens, 1847. (Fisher F709.32 1).

    ETA: The Symbolism of the Phallus Associated with Female Deities: Fertility or Aggression? A Study on Neith and Lion-Headed Goddesses. An abstract from the 2023 CRE conference in Basel (p 8). "Regarding Neith, we have epigraphical sources, while for Mut and Sekhmet the sources are iconographical. My initial hypothesis was that the erected phallus could be a symbol of aggressiveness, often associated with these deities, while further research also points to a possible association with fertility."

    Sekhmet

    May. 29th, 2010 10:14 pm
    ikhet_sekhmet: (ankh-mi-re)
    Well! Now it's time to do the same thing for Sekhmet. I'll go through my photocopies and downloads, make notes from them, and update this posting as I go; eventually I'll turn it all into a brief summary.

    This way to the notes )
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Butterfly hair)
    A large number of recorded public lectures given at the California Museum of Ancient Art are available on CD. I hugely enjoyed a 1987 talk by Dr William Fulco titled "The Love Goddess in Western Semitic Tradition" - here are a few notes from that.

    As an example of cultural exchange between Hurrian and Vedic culture, Fulco compares the depiction of Kali with a description of a victorious Anat, who wears a necklace of heads and a girdle of hands. (ETA: A comparison also made by Marvin H. Pope.)

    Fascinatingly, Fulco suggests that goddesses such as Anat and Athirat may be the active versions of the things their corresponding gods represent; for example, where Baal is the war, Anat is the actual fighting. (I think there's got to be a comparison here with the Hindu idea of Shakti.) He connects the ambiguous sexuality which crops up throughout ANE religion. Later in the talk, discussing the significance of names, he remarks that Anat and other goddesses are sometimes called the "Name of Baal" - that is, "an external manifestation of [Baal's] personality"; "that reality visible and manifested to the outside - that you can interrelate with". Fulco also relates this to the feminine spirit of God in the Bible.

    Regarding the question of whether Asherah was the consort of Yahweh, Fulco suggests that she was seen that way in popular rather than "normative" worship (and hence all the condemnations of the practice in the Bible, which "give you a picture of what's actually going on"!)

    Regarding the relationship ANE religions and Christianity, Fulco rather wonderfully says: "If I may put it in a faith context, if the Incarnation means anything, it means coming in the language people understand... Near Eastern mythology, mythological language, forms of worship and so on were things people understood, and I think that's what the Incarnation means, it means to use those, change those... I feel quite comfortable with it. It gives me a sense of historical context."

    __
    Pope, Marvin H. "The Goddesses Anat and Kali," summary, Vol. II, 51, in
    Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of Orientalists. New Delhi, 1968.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Squeezing out the pips )
    __

    Fiore, Silvestro. Voices From the Clay: the development of Assyro-Babylonian Literature. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1965.

    Ritual sex

    Feb. 17th, 2007 11:24 pm
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    I wrote the following unpublished letter to On the Issues in 1997, responding to an article on the Goddess movement which contained a number of striking inaccuracies (human sacrifice in Ancient Egypt?!).

    For me, the most interesting point is the confusion between ritual sex and commercial sex, which crops up everywhere, partly due to confusing terms like "sacred prostitution". I'm just reading an article from Signs about this very point, which reminded me that I wanted to repost the letter, which originally appeared on my now defunct feminist Web site, along with my references.

    Read more... )
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Apologies for spamming you all recently. One of the mes of depression is the obsessive re-organising of folders and files. :-) I hope at least some of it's of interest. I'll try to use cuts a little more.

    Ishtar of Alalakh will **** up your **** like wo )
    __

    Na'aman, Nadav. The Ishtar Temple at Alalakh. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 39(3) July 1980, pp 209-214.
    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Anne Draffkorn Kilmer argued in a 1971 paper that the reason Erishkigal was forced to hand over the slain Inanna/Ishtar to her rescuers is that the oath She makes just beforehand obliges Her to them as host to guest. Perhaps so - although as so often happens it's other, incidental stuff in the article that piqued my interest!

    Kilmer discusses Ishtar's motive in visiting the Netherworld. She notes that in the Sumerian version, Inanna claims She's there for the funeral of Ereshkigal's husband; but Kilmer argues that, in all Her finery, Inanna is "inappropriately dressed for funereal rites" as well as "haughty and demanding" - and hence is stripped and humbled.

    Kilmer also deals with the rescuers, whose ambiguous sexuality is often interpreted as the key to their free entrance of the Underworld. In the Sumerian story, there are the kurgarra and kalaturra, often interpreted as "sexless creatures"; Kilmer suggests they are instead "some kind of transvestites, or male prostitutes, or even 'hermaphrodites', but who were entertainers by profession, perhaps female impersonators." In the Akkadian story, there's just one rescuer: Asušu-namir, often interpreted as a eunuch, "but whose name implies 'His face is pretty'" - so Kilmer suggests he might be the same as the Sumerian rescuers. He's cursed by Ereshkigal in a similar way to the curse against the female prostitute in the Epic of Gilgamesh. I'm intrigued by these liminal figures and hope to learn more about them.

    Finally, in a footnote, Kilmer refers to the story of Philemon and Baucis from Ovid's Metamorphoses: "because they alone of all their countrymen gave hospitality to two divine visitors, were the only persons spared from the all-destructive flood that was brought as punishment for that inhospitability." Is there any link between this and the story of the inhospitable Sodom? In an effort to show that the Mesopotamians must have had a hospitality code, despite a lack of textual evidence for it, Kilmer refers to the codes of the Hebrews and Bedouin.
    __

    Kilmer, Anne Draffkorn. How was Queen Ereshkigal tricked? A new interpretation of the Descent of Ishtar. Ugarit-Forschungen 3 1971, pp 299-309.

    Profile

    ikhet_sekhmet: (Default)
    Plaything of Sekhmet

    December 2024

    S M T W T F S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    222324252627 28
    293031    

    Syndicate

    RSS Atom

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 04:14 am
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios